<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Skepticism.Net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticism.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticism.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 10:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Review of The Axemaker&#8217;s Gift by czxcxz</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticism.net/articles/2000/review-of-the-axemakers-gift/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>czxcxz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 02:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devilsadvocate.org/skepticism/?p=124#comment-191</guid>
		<description>zxczxc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zxczxc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Paul Spite</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticism.net/about/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Spite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Dear Sirs,

While carbon emissions have no discernable effect on climate, the belief they do is netting promoters of this “crisis” billions per year in return for our gullibility. Meanwhile they change nothing of their own lifestyles, though they also live on the planet they claim we are destroying. 

Your website leads me to believe we have the same concerns about the profit and power grab masquerading as concern over a non-existent climate crisis. Would you help me promote to your readership, a book I have written? I had hoped if enough people read it, it would create a public backlash against this hoax. I have thus, with my own efforts, been unable to publicize this work.

This book is entitled “A Climate Crisis a la Gore.” It is organized as follows:

•	Introduction – What motivated the assembly of this research for public use.
•	Part 1 – excerpted ideas from Mr. Gore’s book, The Assault on Reason, regarding what he claims to be the proper and reasonable way to enter an argument or evidence in the marketplace of ideas, the forum of reason, the real power behind democracy.
•	Part 2 – An event by event analysis of the claims presented by Mr. Gore in his documentary, An Inconvenient Truth. These are evaluated with simple logic, claims elsewhere in the documentary, the principles of reasoning found in Mr. Gore’s latest book, and against scientific research and findings regarding the subjects of his claims.
•	Part 3 – A discussion of the players and special interest groups active in creating the perception of a crisis involving global climate. The history of the movement is examined, motives behind involvement, dollar amounts of profit already being reaped by the various promoters, and what else they stand to gain if America enacts carbon legislation. 
•	Conclusion – The coming economic storm resulting from an enactment of carbon cap-and-trade legislation and a plea to readers to contact legislators requesting any such laws be reconsidered.

Excerpts can be reviewed and the book can be ordered at Amazon.com by entering the title, ISBN# (978-1-4196-8684-9) or by following the link http://www.amazon.com/Climate-Crisis-Gore-perception-warming/dp/1419686844/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&#38;s=books&#38;qid=1202424474&#38;sr=8-1 If you are willing to read or review it, I believe you would be willing to inform your readers of the contents. An informed population of voters is the only real check and balance system we can depend upon.

Sincerely,

Paul Spite</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sirs,</p>
<p>While carbon emissions have no discernable effect on climate, the belief they do is netting promoters of this “crisis” billions per year in return for our gullibility. Meanwhile they change nothing of their own lifestyles, though they also live on the planet they claim we are destroying. </p>
<p>Your website leads me to believe we have the same concerns about the profit and power grab masquerading as concern over a non-existent climate crisis. Would you help me promote to your readership, a book I have written? I had hoped if enough people read it, it would create a public backlash against this hoax. I have thus, with my own efforts, been unable to publicize this work.</p>
<p>This book is entitled “A Climate Crisis a la Gore.” It is organized as follows:</p>
<p>•	Introduction – What motivated the assembly of this research for public use.<br />
•	Part 1 – excerpted ideas from Mr. Gore’s book, The Assault on Reason, regarding what he claims to be the proper and reasonable way to enter an argument or evidence in the marketplace of ideas, the forum of reason, the real power behind democracy.<br />
•	Part 2 – An event by event analysis of the claims presented by Mr. Gore in his documentary, An Inconvenient Truth. These are evaluated with simple logic, claims elsewhere in the documentary, the principles of reasoning found in Mr. Gore’s latest book, and against scientific research and findings regarding the subjects of his claims.<br />
•	Part 3 – A discussion of the players and special interest groups active in creating the perception of a crisis involving global climate. The history of the movement is examined, motives behind involvement, dollar amounts of profit already being reaped by the various promoters, and what else they stand to gain if America enacts carbon legislation.<br />
•	Conclusion – The coming economic storm resulting from an enactment of carbon cap-and-trade legislation and a plea to readers to contact legislators requesting any such laws be reconsidered.</p>
<p>Excerpts can be reviewed and the book can be ordered at Amazon.com by entering the title, ISBN# (978-1-4196-8684-9) or by following the link <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Climate-Crisis-Gore-perception-warming/dp/1419686844/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1202424474&amp;sr=8-1" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Climate-Crisis-Gore-perception-warming/dp/1419686844/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1202424474&amp;sr=8-1</a> If you are willing to read or review it, I believe you would be willing to inform your readers of the contents. An informed population of voters is the only real check and balance system we can depend upon.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Paul Spite</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tuvalu Is Not Sinking by ajay</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticism.net/articles/2002/tuvalu-is-not-sinking/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>ajay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 09:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devilsadvocate.org/skepticism/?p=62#comment-106</guid>
		<description>very good work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very good work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does HIV Cause AIDS? by jhimmi</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticism.net/articles/2001/does-hiv-cause-aids/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>jhimmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 18:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepticism.devilsadvocate.org/articles/2001/does-hiv-cause-aids/#comment-95</guid>
		<description>It's telling that two of the three criteria listed here use the oxymoronic 'almost universally'. 

I have never seen statistics on the number of 'AIDS' cases that were not HIV positive, probably because very early on, AIDS was defined as HIV positive - how in the world can we know? An ostensibly heterosexual man who dies of Kaposi Sarcoma is not going to be tested for HIV. Millions in Africa die of starvation and Ebola and genocide - so who is classifying AIDS deaths in Africa? Could it be a Western liberal with an agenda? Of course, why else would they be in Africa in the first place?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s telling that two of the three criteria listed here use the oxymoronic &#8216;almost universally&#8217;. </p>
<p>I have never seen statistics on the number of &#8216;AIDS&#8217; cases that were not HIV positive, probably because very early on, AIDS was defined as HIV positive - how in the world can we know? An ostensibly heterosexual man who dies of Kaposi Sarcoma is not going to be tested for HIV. Millions in Africa die of starvation and Ebola and genocide - so who is classifying AIDS deaths in Africa? Could it be a Western liberal with an agenda? Of course, why else would they be in Africa in the first place?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.210 seconds -->
