|
Skepticism.Net |
|
|
Is Organic Agriculture Viable? Probably Not
Wednesday, June 26, 2002 Ronald Bailey took a look at the inconvenient parts of a Swiss study that the media largely covered as offering proof that organic farming was viable and efficient. A close look at the study, however, finds that it is neither. First, it is important to note that organic crops are not efficient at all when it comes to land use. The crop yields the Swiss researchers found were significantly lower for organic crops than for intensive modern farming. Bailey notes that the study found that organic "cereal crop yields in Europe typically are 60 to 70% of those under conventional management." This simply confirms what has been obvious for a long time -- any wholesale switch away from intensive farming to organic farming would mean converting massive amounts of land to agricultural purposes. The Swiss researchers maintain, however, that organic farming is more energy efficient. Their study claims that organic farms use only half the energy that conventional farms do. The difference is mainly due to the use of fertilizers and pesticides in intensive agriculture. By the time that the higher crop yields of intensive farming is factored in, though, this 50 percent energy savings is lowered to 19 percent. But does organic farming really save energy? Not according to Bailey,
So much for sustainable agriculture. Source: Organic Alchemy: Organic farming could kill billions of people. Ronald Bailey, Reason, June 5, 2002. Discuss (0 Replies) | Printer Friendly |
|
|
|
© Copyright 1998-2002 by Brian Carnell. All rights reserved |