|
Skepticism.Net |
|
|
Study Finds No Benefit to Asthmatics from Homeopathic Remedies
Monday, March 4, 2002 Southampton General Hospital in Great Britain recently conducted a study to measure whether or not Homeopathy was effective in treating asthma, as its proponents claim. Researchers identified 242 people who were asthmatic and allergic to house dust mite. Researchers gave some of those people a homeopathic remedy for asthma and the other half a placebo. The results? No difference in lung function or quality of life between the group that received the placebo and the group that received the homeopathic remedy. Of course this did not do a thing to dent support for treating asthma with homeopathic remedies among its supporters. The BBC quotes Dr. Peter Fisher who practices at the Royal London Homeopathic Hospital and is critical of this study. Fisher tells the BBC that, "There have been four studies completed which show homeopathy does work for hay fever, asthma and perennial rhinitis." But those studies were all small and not as methodologically robust as this latest study, as the authors note in their discussion of their findings which were published in the March 2 issue of the British Medical Journal. Consider, for example, one of the studies alluded to by Fisher -- a 28 patient study of homeopathic remedies given to rhinitis sufferers. It did find a benefit to homeopathy, but it had a serious flaw as the authors of the BMJ study note,
The presence of subjective entrance criteria for the earlier rhinitis study is a huge red flag Source: Use of ultramolecular potencies of allergen to treat asthmatic people allergic to house dust mite: double blind randomised controlled clinical trial. G T Lewith, A D Watkins, M E Hyland, S Shaw, J A Broomfield, G Dolan, and S T Holgate. British Medical Journal, 2002;324:520, March 2, 2002. Homeopathy 'no benefit' to asthmatics. The BBC, March 1, 2002. Discuss (0 Replies) | Printer Friendly |
|
|
|
© Copyright 1998-2002 by Brian Carnell. All rights reserved |